H. Lynn Greer, Jr.

H.Lynn Greer, Jr. Mediator

Franklin, Tennessee 37064


Debt, Insurance, Partnership Disputes, Personal Injury, Property/Casualty, Real Estate, Regulatory, Title Insurance, Trusts and Estates

Lynn Greer is a Rule 31 Listed Civil Mediator specializing in real estate, business, public utilities and general mediation.  Licensed in the real estate business since 1961, Mr. Greer has spent his entire career in real estate and mortgage banking and was appointed to serve as a Director of the Tennessee Regulatory Authority (Tennessee’s public utilities commission).  Mr. Greer holds a Bachelors degree in Economics from Middle Tennessee State University, graduated from the School of Mortgage Banking at Northwestern University and Rule 31 Civil Mediation Training at Lipscomb University.

Lynn Greer has been active in the real estate and mortgage banking industry since 1961.  He spent six years as Chairman/Director of the Tennessee Regulatory Authority.  He has been President of both the Greater Nashville Association of Realtors and Tennessee Association of Realtors, Chairman of the Tennessee Housing and Development Agency, Member of the Metropolitan Nashville Board of Equalization, Vice Chairman of the Tennessee State Board of Education, Chairman of the Davidson County Election Commission, President of Nashville Ballet, President of the MTSU Foundation and Chairman of the Board of Trustees at Martin Methodist College.  He is a volunteer mediator for the Nashville Conflict Resolution Center.

Lynn Greer’s many years of business, leadership and life experiences have him well prepared for the practice of mediation.


Mediation is the attempt to help parties in a disagreement to hear one another, to minimise the harm that can come from disagreement (e.g. hostility or ‘demonising’ of the other parties) to maximize any area of agreement, and to find a way of preventing the areas of disagreement from interfering with the process of seeking a compromise or mutually agreed outcome.

Mediation, as used in law, is a form of alternative dispute resolution (ADR), a way of resolving disputes between two or more parties with concrete effects. Typically, a third party, the mediator, assists the parties to negotiate a settlement. Disputants may mediate disputes in a variety of domains, such as commercial, legal, diplomatic, workplace, community and family matters.

The term "mediation" broadly refers to any instance in which a third party helps others reach agreement. More specifically, mediation has a structure, timetable and dynamics that "ordinary" negotiation lacks. The process is private and confidential, possibly enforced by law. Participation is typically voluntary. The mediator acts as a neutral third party and facilitates rather than directs the process. Mediation is becoming a more peaceful and internationally accepted solution in order to end conflict. Mediation can be used to resolve disputes of any magnitude.

Mediators use various techniques to open, or improve, dialogue and empathy between disputants, aiming to help the parties reach an agreement. Much depends on the mediator's skill and training. As the practice gained popularity, training programs, certifications and licensing followed, producing trained, professional mediators committed to the discipline.

The benefits of mediationinclude:

While a mediator may charge a fee comparable to that of an attorney, the mediation process generally takes much less time than moving a case through standard legal channels. While a case in the hands of a lawyer or a court may take months or years to resolve, mediation usually achieves a resolution in a matter of hours. Taking less time means expending less money on hourly fees and costs.
While court hearings are public, mediation remains strictly confidential. No one but the parties to the dispute and the mediator or mediators know what happened. Confidentiality in mediation has such importance that in most cases the legal system cannot force a mediator to testify in court as to the content or progress of mediation. Many mediators destroy their notes taken during a mediation once that mediation has finished. The only exceptions to such strict confidentiality usually involve child abuse or actual or threatened criminal acts.
Mediation increases the control the parties have over the resolution. In a court case, the parties obtain a resolution, but control resides with the judge or jury. Often, a judge or jury cannot legally provide solutions that emerge in mediation. Thus, mediation is more likely to produce a result that is mutually agreeable for the parties.
Because the result is attained by the parties working together and is mutually agreeable, compliance with the mediated agreement is usually high. This further reduces costs, because the parties do not have to employ an attorney to force compliance with the agreement. The mediated agreement is, however, fully enforceable in a court of law.
Parties to a mediation are typically ready to work mutually toward a resolution. In most circumstances the mere fact that parties are willing to mediate means that they are ready to "move" their position. The parties thus are more amenable to understanding the other party's side and work on underlying issues to the dispute. This has the added benefit of often preserving the relationship the parties had before the dispute.
Mediators are trained in working with difficult situations. The mediator acts as a neutral facilitator and guides the parties through the process. The mediator helps the parties think "outside of the box" for possible solutions to the dispute, broadening the range of possible solutions
P: 615-516-1188 C
P: 615-354-0550 O
E: [email protected]