Creating a Co-parenting Plan that Works

A co-parenting plan is a structured agreement that describes how two parents who are no longer together will raise the child. It contains information about visitation times and dates, as well as other information deemed important by the parents. Establishing an effective co-parenting plan can help lay out the critical information and avoid future conflict.

When drafting a co-parenting plan, it is especially important to use clear and unambiguous language. In case the parenting plan needs to be enforced, a judge must be able to read the specific provisions in question. Phrases such as “reasonable visitation” or “liberal visitation” will be more difficult to enforce because of their lack of precision. A well-defined schedule that details specific visitation dates and holiday plans is a better option.

It is important to include information about each provision that can be reasonably predicted to cause problems. This can vary in each case. However, it may include addressing issues regarding medical treatments, religious decisions, extracurricular activities and educational decisions. The parents might include a provision that requires mediation in the event that a dispute does arise.

One common point of contention in family law cases is a move by one of the parents, especially the parent who has more time with the child. A parenting plan may establish provisions regarding this issue, as well as related issues as out of state or out of country travel. In order to maximize access time with the child, the parents may also want to establish language that gives them the opportunity to care for the child if the other parent is to be gone during his or her normal time with the child.

Perhaps most importantly, a parenting plan should include language that adjusts visitation time with the child based on his or her age and developmental needs.

Options Regarding the Distribution of Real Property upon Divorce

When a couple divorces, real property is often the most expensive asset that they have to divide.  The parties may not be aware of the different options concerning how to divide this property.  Some options may include:

Selling the Property

If neither spouse wants to keep the property or believes that they would be unable to afford to keep and maintain it, selling the property may be the best option.  Once the property is sold, the couple would split the proceeds.  The proportion that each spouse is entitled to depends on whether the property is community property or marital property, how much each party contributed to paying off the property or enhancing its value and any agreement between the spouses regarding this distribution.

Rent the Property

In down real estate markets, the spouses may agree to rent out the property.  The rental income may be used to offset spousal support or otherwise supplement one of the spouse’s incomes.  The couple may also agree to split the income between them.

Agree to Sell

The parties may agree to sell the property but at a later point in time.  This type of agreement may include more details and instructions, including a minimum amount that a spouse would be willing to accept for the sale of the property and which real estate agency or firm to use for the transaction.

Buy Out a Share

Another possible option is for one spouse to keep the property by buying the other spouse out of his or her share.  This may be accomplished by substituting assets that are of a similar value to the other spouse’s share of the home.  The spouse who will retain possession of the home is often required to refinance the property so that the other spouse is not still financially liable or linked to the property.

Divorce Modification and Enforcement

A divorce decree often contains provisions regarding a number of key issues. It may indicate the property distribution agreement between the couple, child support orders, the parenting plan, custodial arrangements and spousal support information. Sometimes changes may require an adjustment while in others, enforcement is sought after one of the parties did not comply with the original court order.

In some instances, modification can be completed by agreement. The parties may make slight adjustments to accommodate each other. In other instances, there may be a more major change, such as a change in visitation schedule because a parent’s work schedule has changed. The parties may prefer to memorialize this change by having the judge sign off on a modification, effectively altering the original agreement.

In other instances, a party may be the target of a motion to hold him or her in contempt or a motion to modify the existing order. If the parties do not agree, the judge can hear testimony and receive evidence of why he or she should modify the order or enforce the order against one of the parties. Being found in contempt can lead to serious consequences sometimes including jail time. Contempt can also sometimes impact aspects of the case, such as visitation time.

Rather than taking part in a process which may only lead to further contention and involvement between parties who no longer want to be together, the parties may negotiate a settlement. Mediation can sometimes help parties’ at odds reach an amicable solution that is catered to the particular needs of the case. Often when one party makes a concession, the other party may be willing to make similar concessions in hopes of resolving the dispute and avoiding future litigation. Arbitration may also be considered as another alternative in order to more quickly resolve the dispute.

Mediation is a Successful Tool for Settling Alimony Disputes

Mediation is one of the most effective tools for settling alimony disputes.  It can be used throughout a divorce to create an arrangement that works for both spouses, but is especially helpful regarding alimony.  Most attorneys find their clients are willing to negotiate alimony, as long as the negotiations are respectful, and their concerns are understood by everyone involved.

Alimony is often one of the most contentious issues in a divorce.  Spouses can work through parenting time and child support issues because they can put the best interest of the children at the forefront of their decisions.  Division of property might also be determined in the best interest of the children.  Alimony is based only on providing support or receiving support from someone whom you no longer have a romantic relationship.  The debate over who should pay what to whom is hampered by ego and it is easy for alimony negotiations to spin out of control.

Mediation keeps things under control and ensures that everyone’s concerns are taken into account.  Skilled mediators can guide divorcing couples toward a civilized understanding of the situation.  Often, alimony is a temporary arrangement, so when each spouse is able to view it as a means to an end, they are more willing to accept the situation.

Finally, mediation also alleviates the tendency for divorcing spouses to use alimony against one another.  Instead of punishing a spouse with an alimony arrangement, it becomes a tool used to help both spouses lead independent lives once their marriage has ended.  Nobody is being punished – they are each simply given an opportunity to successfully live separate lives.  Mediators can paint a picture of independent living and encourage spouses to negotiate a settlement that is fair and appropriate for meeting both of their long-term goals.

Using Mediation to Settle Alimony Issues in Divorce

Image courtesy of David Castillo Dominici / freedigitalphotos.net

Alimony, known as spousal support in some states, is one of the most hotly contested issues in a divorce.  Mediation can be an effective tool for settling disputes related to alimony.  When a divorcing couple is unable to settle on an arrangement that is fair, mediation can bring them together in a controlled environment to discuss the issues.

In most states, alimony that is determined by the courts is based on a standard set of guidelines.  Additionally, many states now allow for only temporary alimony, which is intended to assist one spouse in working toward self-sufficiency following a divorce.  Despite the guidelines that are in place for determining alimony, some couples still face challenges when settling on an amount and duration for payments.

Since alimony is also contingent on other factors, such as distribution of property and responsibilities for children and the home, it can be difficult for couples to reach a settlement they both believe to be fair.  It is these intangible issues that are often discussed in detail during mediation.  The mediator’s role is to help each spouse understand one another’s role during the marriage and how that affects the arrangement going forward.  The goal of mediation in alimony disputes is to avoid the vindictive nature that can arise during litigation and focus on creating an arrangement that makes sense and works for everyone involved.

Guiding clients toward mediation can be a challenge because there are so many emotions involved in divorce.  They might be fearful they will miss out or be taken advantage of if they attempt a compromise.  Once they understand that mediation gives them complete control over the outcome – more so than they would have in litigation – they are often willing to give mediation a try.  Ultimately, it is the best tool available to help them achieve their goals.

Asset Distribution Mediation Following a Divorce: Who Gets What

Image courtesy of David Castillo Dominici / freedigitalphotos.net

Image courtesy of David Castillo Dominici / freedigitalphotos.net

Equitable asset distribution following a divorce doesn’t always go smoothly, and when there’s tension, determining “who gets what” can only worsen it.   Since a large percentage of divorces follow months (and even years) of arguments and disputes between a divorcing couple, asset distribution can be seen as a sort of final straw that brings the couple’s conflict to its worst stage—and there’s good reason for this.

Assets and property are tied to emotions.   A home that the couple shared, and potentially even raised a family in, holds memories and a sense of security that are difficult to let go of.   The items within that home—perhaps items that the couple purchased together during better days—remind of a time when there was happiness instead of conflict, or romance instead of emotional distance.   Therefore, dividing up these assets often ends up being a highly emotional process, since there is more happening than what’s on the surface.

 Added to this is the financial uncertainty that divorce almost always brings to both spouses.   Such uncertainty can escalate the desire to keep as much property and assets as possible.   Since one spouse will likely stay in the marital home while the other finds a new place to live, the spouse who is moving out will have the additional financial concerns of purchasing new furniture and paying moving expenses.   Without acknowledging this, one partner could end up shouldering more of the financial burden of the divorce than the other, prompting added resentment to an already bitter situation.

These issues all add up to the necessity of communicating openly about asset distribution, and there is no better legal process to do this than asset distribution mediation.   Asset distribution mediation allows the divorcing couple to discuss the financial implications of the divorce, along with the most fair way to equally divide assets between them.   A trained asset distribution mediator will be able to suggest ways in which the couple can do this without the added tension of “lawyering up” and attempting to take as much as possible with them in the divorce out of spite or anger.

How to Make Sure Divorce Has Minimal Impact on Your Children through Child Custody Mediation

ID-10063256

Image courtesy of Ambro / freedigitalphotos.net

Child custody battles are too often bitter and destructive, leaving children in the center of a tug-of-war that has little to do with their best interests.  This is especially true when the custody struggle takes place in a litigated setting, as lawyers battle for their client’s best interest rather than the children who are at the center of the battle.

Any parent who has been through this and who has seen the negative effects it has will admit that litigation is not always the best way to handle it.  However, when a couple is divorcing and both want to spend time with their children that they love dearly, how can it be settled otherwise with fewer negative consequences?

The answer is simple: child custody mediation.  In child custody mediation, a neutral third-party mediator works with divorcing or separating parents to determine a child custody arrangement and schedule that has minimal impact on the child’s life and that avoids the bitter contention of a courtroom battle.  In child custody mediation, the parents work together (instead of against each other) to determine what is best for them and their family.

 The approach a child custody mediator will take is one that involves a frank, honest discussion about how the custody and visitation schedule would work to benefit everyone (most especially the children).  In the child custody mediation process, the divorcing couple would be encouraged to work together to come up with the following:

  • A custody and visitation schedule
  • The list of possible foreseeable exceptions that would deviate from the regular schedule, such as holidays and vacations
  • The method in which the divorcing parents will communicate with each other about the children; for example, regarding school issues, homework, extracurricular activities, etc.
  • How special issues will be handled, such as religious exposure, medical care, etc.

Child custody mediation works because it encourages open and honest communication about the important topics rather than a battle that is all about selfish motives.  This honest communication is the initial step to ensuring that a divorce or separation has minimal impact on their children’s lives and emotional health.