Benefits of Using ADR to Establish Paternity

While it may not appear so, paternity can be a complex topic. Generally, the courts will look to certain actions to determine a child’s legal parent, which can make matters complicated.

For example, courts will look to determine if a father has signed the birth certificate or completed an acknowledgment of paternity. However, this can be a complicated process as many states permit a father to contest paternity even after signing a form of this nature. However, the court often requires a specific type of paternity test to be completed before it will disavow someone as the father. This often includes ordering a paternity test in court and having the results clarify the situation.

In some instances, a person who is not the biological father of a child may contest paternity and may still be required to support the child even if it is determined he is not the child’s biological father. This can be due to a married father being presumed to be the father, a father not having enough evidence to refute such a presumption or because of state laws that limit the amount of time a father has to contest paternity.

Rather than dealing with these legal complications, some parties use alternative dispute resolution to verify paternity. ADR often provides a more private experience so that the party’s interactions and grievances do not have to be aired out in court. Additionally, ADR tends to be less contentious and hostile than many family law cases that are contested. By using this process to establish paternity, the groundwork is laid for an amicable process to determine other rights, such as custody or visitation.

Resolving Eminent Domain Disputes Using ADR Methods

Eminent domain describes the ability of the state to take private property for public use. It is easy to understand why something like this could trigger a vicious legal battle that takes a great amount of time to resolve. Unfortunately, within that timeframe, individuals can exhaust their resources fighting the government and the project the government intended to create can go undone, which can be a detriment to society.

So what is the best way to resolve eminent domain issues? It is even possible to achieve a resolution that makes everyone happy – especially the individuals who are at the mercy of a government with vast resources and powerful attorneys?

Often, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) is the best way to resolve the issue.

Eminent domain requires the state provide fair compensation in exchange for whatever property it assumed ownership over. Of course, what the government deems fair and what the owner who is losing his or her property deem fair can be light years apart. This is where ADR can have a significant impact.

What are the benefits of using ADR methods like arbitration and mediation for resolving eminent domain disputes?

ADR is confidential. It doesn’t matter if mediation or arbitration is chosen, both offer a private method for resolving legal disputes. The private information of the individual will not be accessible in public records during the process and anything that is discussed during either process cannot later be used against either party.

ADR is flexible. Using mediation or arbitration to resolve an eminent domain dispute works so well because there is an ability to tailor the resolution to suit the specific needs of those involved. In mediation, it is the disputing parties that have complete control over the outcome, so if they are willing to agree on an unorthodox solution, they are free to pursue it provided it is legal.

Eminent domain disputes can grow into ugly battles, but ADR makes them easier to resolve.